Friday, October 21, 2011

Dakha Geet 41


kIqy bcnF qFeIN inBfAuxf

lfh gwloN gulfmI nMU isMGo Kflsqfn bxfAuxf,
sMq iBMzrF vfilaF dy kIqy bcnF qFeIN inBfAuxf.

ijs ihMdU kOm dI sLfn leI, isMGF ny bhuq qsIhy Jwly,
ihMd nMU bcfAux leI, isMGF rfh kMizafly mwly.

hux ienHF iqlkDfrIaF nMU isMGo, Cwz idAu mUMh lgfxf,
lfh gwloN gulfmI nMU isMGo Kflsqfn bxfAuxf,
sMq iBMzrF vfilaF dy kIqy bcnF qFeIN inBfAuxf.

lY krjf mukry ny, nfly pRAupkfrF nMU Buwly,
ienHF leI isWKF dy isMGo lhU bhuq ny zuwly.

nOvyN gurU sfihb nMU ienHF leI, ipaf sI idWlI sIs ktfAuxf,
lfh gwloN gulfmI nMU isMGo Kflsqfn bxfAuxf,
sMq iBMzrF vfilaF dy kIqy bcnF qFeIN inBfAuxf.

DOKybfjL ihMdUsqfnI muwZ qoN ny, isMGo hux nf DoKf KfieA,
Kflsqfn ibnF nhIN srnf, isMGo ihMd gulfmI pry htfieAu.

sMn 47 vflf jUlf gulfmI df, isMGo muV ky gwlH nhIN pfAuxf,
lfh gwloN gulfmI nMU isMGo Kflsqfn bxfAuxf,
sMq iBMzrF vfilaF dy kIqy bcnF qFeIN inBfAuxf.

ihMdU awqvfd df kihr vriqaf, aMimRqsr sLihr ‘qy,
isMGo qusIN idl ‘qy sbk vsfAu, sLhIdI jfg idlF ‘qy lfAu.

Gr afeI afjLfdI nMU, sMn 47 vFg nf GroN Bjfxf,
afjLfdI dy hmdrd bx ky, afjLfdI nMU gwlHy lgfxf.
lfh gwloN gulfmI nMU isMGo Kflsqfn bxfAuxf,
sMq iBMzrF vfilaF dy kIqy bcnF qFeIN inBfAuxf.
lfh gwloN gulfmI nMU isMGo Kflsqfn bxfAuxf,
sMq iBMzrF vfilaF dy kIqy bcnF qFeIN inBfAuxf.

Kflsqfn ijMLdfbfd
prmjIq isMG syKoN (dfKf)
510-774-5909
Parmjit Singh Sekhon (Dakha)
President, Dal Khalsa Alliance

Sunday, October 9, 2011

THE MOVEMENT FOR LIBERATION OF KHALISTAN IS NOT A SUDDEN SPONTANEOUS REACTION; IN FACT IT IS A RESTORATION OF A LOST SOVEREIGNTY: SPOKESMAN, KASHMIR DIASPORA ALLIANCE


THE MOVEMENT FOR LIBERATION OF KHALISTAN
IS NOT A SUDDEN SPONTANEOUS REACTION;
IN FACT IT IS A RESTORATION OF A LOST SOVEREIGNTY: 
SPOKESMAN, KASHMIR DIASPORA ALLIANCE

Indian authorities must revisit their book of records because Punjab Khalistan was never a part of India. It is highly unfortunate the happening the ‘Sikh Nation has gone through. The movement for the liberation of Khalistan is not a spontaneous one and the Sikhs’ struggle for sovereignty, Independence  and political power has been ongoing, by peaceful means, since 14th March, 1849. This was the day when the ‘First Sovereign and Secular’ Sikh nation, Punjab, was lost to the British Empire’s forces. Initially a Sikh General named Banda Singh Bahadar established the 'first' Sikh Raj, the Sikh State, which lasted for about eight years. Following this, a sovereign and secular Sikh Nation existed for 50-year as described below under monarch Ranjit Singh. The rein of monarch Ranjit Singh, 1799 to 14th March, 1849 as the Punjab was the "First Sovereign and Secular Nation" of South Asia, what at the moment is called the 'Brahmins-Hindus' democracy, since 15th August, 1947. Punjab of the Sikhs was forcibly occupied right after the British India Empire gave freedom to the ‘Brahmins-Hindus leadership by the agent of the British Empire in Delhi in the morning hours of 15th August, 1947.
For instance, the three princely head of States: Faridkot in Punjab, Bikaner in Rajasthan and Nawab of Hyderabad had not signed any document of accession to India. These states included the princely State of Patiala of Punjab which had been forced to join India at gunpoint. This cannot be called accession to India in any case.  It is very astonishing that India or as it is being called  incredible India, progressing power of South Asia, a peace-loving Indian democracy by President Obama of the United States, CNN and BBC networks, hour after hour in their international newscasts in Europe in particular and internationally all along, has been on a killing spree ofMuslims of the Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir area, also called the Internationally Disputed Areas of Jammu and Kashmir (IDA:JK) since 15th August, 1947 and the Sikhs of PUNJAB since 1978 when 13 Sikhs were massacred by the Punjab and Indian law-enforcing forces. As such, the 'Brahmins-Hindus administrations' have been engaged in racial discrimination, massacres and genocides in the IDA:JK and secondly in Khalistan which has been illegally occupied by the Indian government since August 15, 1947. In fact, this discrimination is the 'order of the day' of the 'Brahmins-Hindus' administrations, since 15th August, 1947.
Make no mistake, India is sitting on the ‘tip of a volcano’, which could erupt at any time. Movements going on for sovereignty in the IDA:JK,Khalistan, Assam and its 8- sisters, Tamils, Christians, forcible conversion and additional violations like torture, fake encounters, rapes, humiliation, dehumanization, political, religious rights, and heavy handedness by the law-enforcing forces could destroy the so-called incredible democracy of our world. India which is unable to feed its own people, that is, more than 76% of its population of more than 1.2 billion goes to sleep hungry every night, seven days a week and 365 days a year.
Last but not least, the struggle of the Sikhs for sovereignty and independence is going on since 14th March,1849 and will continue until the Indian army leaves Khalistan.

Haqqanis, US and Pakistan
Will they cross the Rubicon?
by D. Suba Chandran


Haqqanis, US and Pakistan
Will they cross the Rubicon?
by D. Suba Chandran
The Tribune 27.9.2011

AFTER the recent Kabul attack by the Haqqani network, there were two damning testimonies by Admiral Mike Mullen, the outgoing Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Mr Leon Panetta, the American Defence Secretary, openly accusing Pakistan and its ISI for using the Haqqani network as a proxy. While this resulted in multiple responses from the political and military leadership of Pakistan, its Foreign Minister threatened the US that Washington would lose Pakistan as an ally. How far will the US and Pakistan go in converting their threats into reality? Can the US and Pakistan afford to break off the ties at this juncture? More importantly, what will happen if both decide to cross the Rubicon and there is a total rupture in the US-Pakistan relations?
First, a short note on the nature of threats. In the last few months, especially after the Abbottabad raid, the US has been conveying a tough message to Pakistan at multiple forums, putting pressure on the latter to stop aiding the Haqqani network, and asking Islamabad to do more in controlling the terrorist groups operating from within its soil. From Mrs Hillary Clinton to Mr Leon Panetta, there have been numerous statements from the American leadership emphasising that Pakistan must keep away from the Haqqani network.
The brazen attack on the American Embassy in Kabul by the Haqqani network seems to have escalated the US responses - from pressurising Pakistan to threatening with action. The testimonies of Admiral Mullen and Defence Secretary Panetta make this change crystal clear. Admiral Mullen, in his testimony before the Congress Armed Forces Committee have been quoted testifying, “with the ISI support, Haqqani operatives planned and conducted that truck bomb attack, as well as the assault on our embassy,” and “the Haqqani network acts as a veritable arm of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency.”
In response, while the Prime Minister of Pakistan and his Interior Minister came with the usual rhetoric that Pakistan wants good relationship with everyone and does not allow its soil to be used by terrorists, General Kayani and the Foreign Minister made nuanced statements. The General in his response said, ““Admiral Mullen knows fully well which all countries are in contact with the Haqqanis,” and “singling out Pakistan is neither fair nor productive.”
Mrs Hina Rabbani Khar, Pakistan’s Foreign Minister, issued an explicit threat that if the US continued with such statements against Islamabad, “you will lose an ally.”
The second part of General Kayani’s response is significant - where he said singling out Pakistan for being in contact with the Haqqanis is neither fair nor productive. What does this mean? Does this mean that, besides Pakistan, there are other countries which are in contact with the Haqqanis? Does this include the US as well? And does Admiral Mullen know this, as General Kayani is hinting?
It appears that both Pakistan and the US have been courting the Haqqanis, perhaps with different objectives and as a part of different strategies. While Pakistan and the ISI may be using the Haqqani network as a “proxy” and a “veritable arm”, what has been the American strategy towards the Haqqanis? Were they not a part of the moderate Taliban until they immoderately targeted the US interests in Afghanistan?
In terms of Pakistan’s counter-threats, while General Kayani has said that singling out Pakistan for being in touch with the Haqqanis would be counterproductive, Khar has said the US may lose an ally. If one has to analyse the meaning of these two threats, it could be interpreted as Islamabad’s readiness to cut the relationship with the US and pursue its own strategic interests in Afghanistan.
The second question: Can the US and Pakistan afford to cross the Rubicon and rupture the ties? The US has done that in the past. After working closely with Pakistan’s military and its ISI during the 1980s, against the Soviet troops, Washington did cut the relationship with Islamabad. Can they afford to do so now? The American strategic community is clearly divided on this issue on whether the US would continue its relationship with Pakistan or not. Those who want to break the relationship argue that despite the investment of billions of dollars in Pakistan since 2001, Islamabad has not helped the American cause in Afghanistan, or the war on terrorism. The hiding of Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad close to a military installation is seen as a Pakistani collusion against American interests.
Those who argue against the rupture consider the nuclear assets of Pakistan and the rising radical threat as a major reason demanding a continuous interaction with Islamabad. The Al-Qaeda network and the stability of Afghanistan demand a substantial presence of the US even after 2014. This section also fears that Pakistan will become a failed state with the jihadi upper hand along with nuclear weapons. This is a nightmare scenario for the US.
On the other hand, Pakistan is also divided, though with the majority itching to break the ties with the US. This section considers that Pakistan is fighting the American war at a huge cost, and is afraid that the US would walk away or worse turn against Pakistan after 2014. So, they ask: Why wait until 2014 to break the ties with the US? The other section, though a minority, fears that such a rupture will not augur well for Pakistan’s democracy as the military, the ISI and, worse, the radical forces will become supreme and take Pakistan in a suicidal trajectory. This section also fears that in case there is a complete rupture of relations between the US and Pakistan, it would not only affect the country’s economy but also lead to Washington siding with New Delhi.
It appears that neither Pakistan nor the US can easily afford to break off their ties that easily. Both will have to pay a heavy price.
Finally, the hypothetical question: What if the US and Pakistan finally cross the Rubicon and break off their relations? The US may cut off its aid to Islamabad which has been in billions of dollars in the last decade, and more importantly, pressurise Pakistan at international forums. The US may also have to live in the perpetual fear of Pakistan’s nuclear assets falling into wrong hands. What are the US options in that case? Can the US expand its drone attacks, or place its boots on the ground in Pakistan? Will the American forces risk an open confrontation with Pakistan’s military? Unlikely.
What would Islamabad do? While the majority within Pakistan expects that their all-weather friend - China — would come to their rescue, the crucial question would be: What is Beijing’s game plan vis-à-vis Pakistan? While China has substantially invested in infrastructure projects within Pakistan, from Gwadar to the Kunjerab Pass, it is unlikely that Beijing will provide substantial aid as Pakistan got from the Americans.
Beijing is also likely to do cost-benefit analysis. Though the Pakistanis may consider their relationship with China as higher than the Himalayas and deeper than the oceans, one is not sure whether the Chinese also feel the same way. Certainly, the Chinese officials in Xinjiang, which shares the border with Gilgit-Baltistan, do not perceive so. While Beijing may not want Pakistan to end up as a failed state, it is unlikely to underwrite Islamabad’s existential problems.
So, what would Pakistan do, especially its military, the ISI and the jihadis, once the relationship with the US is ruptured? What will they do in Afghanistan? Will they turn their ire against the US, or against their ever-ready scapegoat - India? More than the US, should New Delhi not be worried about the breakup of the ties between Washington and its “major” non-NATO ally?
The writer is Director, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, and Visiting Professor, Pakistan Studies Programme, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi.
***********************
Comments by Simranjit Singh Mann
The Shiromani Akali Dal(Amritsar) will have to think but will be the future of the Sikh’s if the Americans break their relationship with Pakistan. Our party has always supported American foreign policy with its rich content of democracy and protection of human rights, but we failed to support the 123 Nuclear agreement with THIS (Theocratic Hindu Indian State) as THIS(Theocratic Hindu Indian State)  has committed the genocide of the Sikhs with impunity and has not signed the NPT. If America loses its relationship with Pakistan and ties up with THIS(Theocratic Hindu Indian State), then we are afraid the Sikhs would not be able to support  a strategic alliance between US and THIS (Theocratic Hindu Indian State). For that matter the Kashmiris’ and the various peoples living in the North-East and West Bengal will either. The Tamils in the South will also not support such a tie up with the racist Aryan Hindu, theocratic state.-
Simranjit Singh Mann,
President
Shiromani Akali Dal(Amritsar)

Promoting Modi for PM’s post?
 He should first apologise for 2002 riots
by Kuldip Nayar


Promoting Modi for PM’s post?

He should first apologise for 2002 riots
by Kuldip Nayar
The Tribune 28.9.2011
FUNDAMENTALIST parties throughout the world think of newer ways to expand their base in the community they seek to radicalise. India’s Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) is no different. It feels that it should increase its support among the Hindu community, 80 per cent of the electorate, and not bother about the rest, including 12 per cent Muslim electorates who, in any way, largely do not vote for the BJP.
The three-day fast by Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi was meant to get more support from among the Hindus. The ambiance of the hall where the fast was undertaken, the saffron-clad gurus and sadhus and the speakers chosen — all reflected the Hindutva ethos. Therefore, there was no room for any divergent viewpoint. The protesters were arrested long before they reached the venue. Modi refused to wear the skull cap which a Muslim cleric offered because this did not fit in with the proclaimed objective of the fast, even though called “sadbhavana” (conciliation). A mere memorandum on behalf of the victims of the 2002 pogrom was not entertained at the reception.
Whether the purpose has been achieved is the question the BJP leadership must mull over. Crowds are no criterion because Modi’s appeal was in the name of Gujarati chauvinism. He talked about the pride of six crores of Gujaratis even in full-page, state-sponsored advertisements in leading newspapers. Moreover, the people were attracted to the place that was airconditioned and were offered free food, costing the exchequer more than Rs 6 crore. Much more money has been spent on dinning into the ears of Gujaratis that Modi has revived their “pride” which was hurt when Jawaharlal Nehru was preferred to Sardar Patel, a Gujarati, as India’s Prime Minister after Independence. Patel’s photo became the backdrop of the dais.
True, Modi has changed the Gujaratis who have returned him with a majority in the state assembly poll twice in a row. This happens when the top man rules in an authoritarian style as Modi does. The developmental work goes to his credit. But the Gujaratis are a gritty, hard working community and they will do well in every clime. I found them on the top of the ladder in the UK 20 years ago when I was India’s High Commissioner in London.
Modi’s fast was not meant to project the progress of the Gujaratis, but to appeal to the Hindu electorate through television channels which unashamedly telecast a purely fundamentalist show all 24 hours. It is difficult to say whether the fast had the desired effect. But it is clear that even the BJP’s allies in the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) were overwhelmingly against him.
The NDA convener, the Janata Dal (United) chief, wanted Modi to assuage the feeling of hurt which Muslims bore. Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, heading the government with the BJP’s support, walked away from journalists when asked to comment on Modi.
Apparently, the BJP’s purpose was to project Modi on the national scene. The party did not attempt in any way to wash away the blood stains on Modi’s administration. What kind of governance was being praised when the Muslims felt insecure and when the Chief Minister’s own senior officials, two IPS and one IAS officers, said in their affidavits that Modi was responsible for what happened in 2002?
The judgment by the Supreme Court with which the BJP has gone to town has only sent the case back to the trial court and has not commented on the allegations against Modi because it wants to judge when the case comes before it for appeal. The Special Investigation Team has exonerated Modi personally, but the amicus curie has given a different report. The jury is still out on this one.
Modi does not, as expected, want to know that there is a minority and a majority in the country. This fits into his policy which his state showed nearly 10 years ago. He, as the BJP leader, does not have to make up with the 16 lakh Gujarati Muslims who have been waiting for justice for the past one decade. Yet, as the state Chief Minister, he is answerable for the killings of some 2000 Muslims at the hands of police-backed mobs.
The Janata Dal (U), a BJP ally, has rightly said that a person who could not control the situation in one state cannot be entrusted with the responsibility of running the country. Modi is being projected as yet another candidate for prime ministership apart from Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley. Modi talks about the education system in the country. His criticism is right but his right to use his fast for the purpose is wrong.
More than the BJP, Modi should realise that the hundreds of days of fast cannot wash away the sins he has committed. He should at least now, when he wants to play a bigger role, apologise for the 2002 riots. The Congress was late in admitting its fault for the 1984 killings of Sikhs, but Prime Minister Manmohan Singh at least offered apologies. He enhanced the compensation to the victims’ families, something which is not on Modi’s agenda.
The unthinking BJP is now concentrating on L.K. Advani’s rath yatra which he had announced before Modi’s fast. The party forgets that Advani is not Anna Hazare who has come to symbolise the fight against corruption. Rightly, the RSS is not enthusiastic about the yatra. I have witnessed Advani’s yatra from Somnath Temple to Babri Masjid before the latter’s demolition. It is apparent that the BJP wants a similar kind of polarisation which resulted in the death of hundreds of Muslims. But the same card cannot be played twice.
The BJP continues to confuse the issue. The voters are not wooed through hatred against the minority community. The party should have learnt the lesson from the last two general elections which it lost. Even the Congress government’s misgovernance was preferred to the BJP’s plank.
The nation is not prepared to face the situation where Hindus are arrayed on the one side and Muslims on the other. The resurgence of terrorism has made people still more worried about the future. It is not that the RSS does not see the danger. But it wants to come to power through whatever means it can employ. The BJP has to reach out to the Muslims, a taboo in its lexicon. Citing the support of Kashmiri leader Mehbooba Mufti does not help when she says she never uttered the words that Modi was not anti-Muslim. Surely, his deeds say so.n
Comments by Simranjit Singh Mann
The Shiromani Akali Dal(Amritsar) states that Mr. Kuldeep Nayar is a good but a devious Hindu journalist who always gives a Hindu twist to his tale. He states that the Muslim genocide were riot in Gujrat perpetrated  by the BJP headed by Narinder Modi, whereas it was the crime of genocide. He carries on to state that like Premier Manmohan Singh has admitted his party’s (Congress) fault for the massacre of the Sikhs in 1984, similarly Narinder Modi should apologise for the massacre of the Muslims. We fail to understand how an apology will minimise the crime of genocide perpetrated against the Muslims and the Sikh peoples? The crimes of genocide of the Sikhs and Muslims have been committed with impunity this far. The Sikhs will not be satisfied till the genocidaires are put up for trial at the International Criminal Court at the Hague. Observers researching events in THIS(Theocratic Hindu Indian State) should take this right wing Hindu nationalist newspaper The Tribune  with a pinch of salt and we request that they should refer to our Website (www.akalidalamritsar.in) whenever in doubt.-
Simranjit Singh Mann,
President
Shiromani Akali Dal(Amritsar)

Bhatt in judicial custody Wife says she fears for her husband's life; police says no threat


Bhatt in judicial custody
Wife says she fears for her husband's life; police says no threat
Ahmedabad, October 1
Senior IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt, who accused Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi of complicity in the 2002 post-Godhra riots, was today sent to judicial custody after a court rejected the plea for police remand.
Police had asked for seven days' custody of Bhatt, who was arrested yesterday, in connection with the complaint filed by constable K D Pant.
However, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate B G Doshi rejected the plea, and sent Bhatt to judicial custody for 15 days.
Earlier in the day, Bhatt's wife Shweta said that she feared for her husband's life, as he had been handed over to the city crime branch.
However, City Police Commissioner Sudhir Sinha said that the apprehension was "unfounded".
The police also went to search Bhatt's house today, for the second time, but had to return when Shweta demanded to see a fresh search warrant. She also alleged that police were harassing them, for speaking the truth.
Bhatt was arrested in connection with the FIR filed by Pant for allegedly threatening him and making him sign a false affidavit with regard to a meeting called by Modi on February 27, 2002, hours after the Godhra train carnage.
Bhatt has been charged under IPC sections 341 (causing wrongful restraint), 342 (causing wrongful confinement), 195 (giving fabricated evidence) and 189 (threat of injury to public servant).
"Today around 30 to 35 police officers came once again to raid our house. But today, I confronted them and asked them to produce a search warrant. They were able to just produce yesterday's warrant as they did not possess a fresh search warrant," Bhatt's wife Shweta told PTI.
"I told them that to search our house based on yesterday's warrant amounted to harassment. They cannot search our house twice on the basis of one warrant," she maintained.
"After that they left our house," Shweta further said.
"The police are trying to harass us as my husband has spoken the truth," Shweta stated. — PTI
Comments by Simranjit Singh Mann
The Shiromani Akali Dal(Amritsar) is of the opinion that when officers disclose the crime of genocide, as was perpetrated against the Muslims in Gujrat by Chief Minister Narinder Modi then the officers who below the whistle are put in the dock, instead of the genocidaries being sent to trial at the International Criminal Court at the Hague. We fail to understand why some countries think that THIS(Theocratic Hindu Indian State) is a democracy and practices the rule of law when the Sikhs, Muslims and Christians suffer state persecution and the abominable crime of genocide his overlooked and the West turns a belind eye to it?
Simranjit Singh Mann,
President
Shiromani Akali Dal(Amritsar)

DALITS AND MINORITIES


DALITS AND MINORITIES
Date: 28th September, 2011
Time: 13:00 - 15:00 Hrs
Room: XXVII, Palais de Nations, Human Rights Council (UN:HRC), Geneva,
SWITZERLAND
Sponsor: LIBERATION
MODERATOR: Altaf Hussain Wani
Speakers: Ms Indra (Norway), Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon, and Madam
Ms Indra spoke about three minutes on the Dalits problems and concluded her presentation within 3-min.

Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon's presentations related to the Racial Discrimination of the Sikhs in India alias the 'Brahmins-Hindus' democracy.

Dr Sekhon began, according to the teachings of the 10th Master (Guru) of Sikhs, Sahib Guru Gobind Singh ji, this all human race is one regardless of its colour, religion, continents they live in, etc. "Ye all Human race is One".

The Sikh religion was founded by Guru Baba Nanak Sahib in the 15th century, when the humans in that part of the world, PUNJAB, now divided in two parts as Punjab under the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the "annexed"Punjab Nation or Sikh Raj of monarch Ranjit Singh, 1799 to 14th March, 1849. Punjab was the "First Sovereign and Secular Nation" of South Asia, what at the moment is called the 'Brahmins-Hindus' democracy's one of states, since 15th August, 1947. Ladies and gentlemen, Punjab of the Sikhs was 'robbed' right after the British India Empire gave freedom and handed over political power to the ‘Brahmins-Hindus-Baniyas (Traders) leadership by British Empire in Delhi's agent in the morning hours of the 15th August, 1947.

Since the subject of this seminar is on the discrimination, I would not go much in the historical side of the 'First Sovereign and Secular' nation of South Asia, i. e., the Sikh Raj or Punjab.

Between 1710 and 1799, the rule in Punjab was a period of 'hide and seek' between the the Mughals and the Sikhs. The former ruled based on their might and the latter, the Sikhs ruled on the hearts of its people, because they belonged to the people. Between this period, a Sikh General named Banda Singh Bahadar established the 'first' Sikh Raj, the Sikh State, which lasted for about eight years. Following this, a sovereign and secular Sikh Nation existed for 50-year as described above under monarch Ranjit Singh. This sovereign Sikh nation was the first 'Secular and Sovereign State of South Asia', in which the Sikhs, Muslims, Christians and Hindus were equal partners of the political power. However, the Hindus-Brahmins- Dogra sect, according to their devious state of mind, started conspiring against the Sikh state of Monarch Ranjit Singh, with the agents of the British Empire or the British ambassador to Punjab. No one should confuse here that this conspiracy was by the agents of the British Empire directly using the Hindus and their Dogra sect, and not with the British East India Company (a company entered the Eastern princely states what is now called India or its predecessor the British East India Company). Later, it was known as the 'British India Empire', until the former handed over the political power to the 'Brahmins and Hindus of the Indian National Congress. The players of which were a 'naked faqir' as called by Sir Winston Churchill, to MK Gandhi (a Baniya of Gujarat), JL Nehru, GB Pant (the Brahmins), VB Patel of Gujarat, and so on.

I must say here that the three princely head of States: Faridkot in Punjab, Bikaner in Rajasthan and Nawab of Hyderabad had not signed any document of accession to India. These states had been forced to join India at the gunpoint. Included in these three may also be the princely State of Patiala of Punjab. This cannot be called accession to India in any case. This is the 'discrimination and racial discrimination' as being discussed under the racial discrimination.

Further, ladies and gentlemen, India what it is being called as incredible India, progressing power of South Asia, a peace-loving Indian democracy by President Obama of the United States, CNN and BBC networks, hour after hours in their international newscasts in Europe in particular and internationally all along, has been on the killing spree of the Muslims of the Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir area, also called as the Internationally Disputed Areas of Jammu and Kashmir (IDA:JK) since 15th August, 1947 and the Sikhs of PUNJAB since 1978 when 13 Sikhs were massacred by the Punjab and Indian law-enforcing forces. As such, the 'Brahmins-Hindus administrations' have been engaged in the racial discrimination, massacres, staged encounters and genocides in the IDA:JK and secondly in the Punjab of Sikhs. In fact, this discrimination is the 'order of the day' of the 'Brahmins-Hindus' administrations, since 15th August, 1947.

In June 1984, all states unaware as to what was going on inhumanly in the Sikhs of Punjab, their religious and political institutions. These all states or the rest of India were all unaware. Even the international community was virtually unaware with the 'ulterior' designs of the peace-loving 'Brahmins- Hindus' administration's deeds. All means of communications, road, rail, and air had been suspended in Punjab, round the clock curfew had been imposed, and an'undeclared war' against the Sikh Nation, PUNJAB, had been waged in a brutal military "Operation Bluestar" of June (3-6), 1984. In three days toll of war had been more than 150,000 innocent Sikhs (infants, children, youth, male and female folks, elderly, etc.) killed indidcriminately. According to the information available from the public 'domain', more than 260,000 innocents had deliberately been killed by the 'Brahmins-Hindus' armed, law-imposing, and intelligence personnel at the order of the Chief, Council of Ministers, New Delhi, since 1st June, 1984 to the day of this writing. This is the state's discrimination against the Sikhs and Muslims of Kashmir in particular, and other minorities in general, i. e., Assam, its 8-sister, Tamils, Biharis, Rajasthan, etc. The Sikh cabinet ministers of the Punjab and New Delhi administrations kept their mouth sealed, simply to protect their cabinet births.

The Sikh Nation, PUNJAB, of the Sikhs has been made a 'landless nation', since the very day of 15th August, 1947. Although the Sikh Nation, Punjab under monarch Ranjit Singh, the British Empire’s time of “annexation” and until it was “robbed” by the ‘Brahmins-Hindus-Baniya leadership, had nothing to do with the ‘British India Empire’. Rather, the “annexed” Sikh Nation, Punjab, the First Sovereign and Secular Sikh nation had been “annexed” to the British Empire. Its “annexation” was announced by Lord Dalhousie on 29th March, 1849, through a radio announcement from Rawalpindi, PUNJAB, now a twin city of Rawalpindi and Islamabad of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Consequently, the “annexed” Sikh Nation was the part of the British Empire on 15th August, 1947; the time when nearly 600 princely states were given the name of a sovereign 'Pakistan under the leadership of Janab M A Jinnah and his staunch supporters. The second sovereign nation that emerged was the ‘Brahmins-Hindus’ India, under Indian National Congress'. The author has no alternative but to say that a Brahmin by birth, grown up in a Khatri family and happened to be the Akali Party of Sikhs’ leader, a traitor of Sikhs ‘betrayed the Sikhs and the Sikhs lost on 15th August, 1947’. It was highly unfortunate happening to the ‘Sikh Nation, PUNJAB; because the “Sikhs’ struggle for Sovereignty, Independence and political power has been going, by peaceful means, since 14th March, 1849.” This was the day when the ‘First Sovereign and Secular’ Sikh nation, Punjab, was lost to the British Empire’s forces. The struggle of the Sikhs for sovereignty and independence is going on since 14th March, 1849 and will continue until the Sikhs become sovereign again.

The figures of the minorities killed in India by the 'Brahmins-Hindus' administrations, since 15th August, 1947, are follows:

Muslims of the IDA:JK Muslims in General: Sikhs since 15th August, 1947 Christians, Tamils, Assam and 8-sister, Dalits, Adivaasis, etc.:
IDA:JK                                                 500,000 
Muslims in general            500,000
Sikhs                                                3.4 million or 34-lakh
Christians                                    312,500
Tamils                                                15,000
Assamese                                    12,000
8-sister of Assam                        12,000
Dalits                                                Tens of thousands

Based on the above statistics of massacres, fake-encounter killings and genocide, the world seems to be watching as a silent spectator of the 'indiscrimination killings' of the minorities of the 'Brahmins-Hindus' Indian democracy. The question arises here is that has such a 'discrimination' taken place in any other country practicing either the parliamentary or the presidential democracy in the history of our world? The answer to this question would probably in ‘no’.

Ladies and gentlemen, Guru Baba Nanak Sahib had given the definition of 'Brahmin' in his teachings inscribed in the Sikhs' Holy Scripture, Guru Granth Sahib ji: "Mathe Tikka Terrh Dhotti Kakhaii Hath Chhurri Jagat Kasaii." What it means in the simple English is the "Brahmin has painted his forehead, has a white cloth around his waste and he is the'Butcher of our peaceful world'. In other words, the ladies and gentlemen, what was true in the 15th century is also true in the 21st century of our times. Now the Brahmins and his Hindu followers have a 'Nuclear Bomb/arsenal' under his possession. For what? To destroy this world, or to destroy the minorities in the 'Brahmins-Hindus' democracy, or to destroy the Islamic Republic of Pakistan?

The Brahmins-Hindus’ democracy alias alleged Indian democracy does not practice the very means of democracy. It isfalsifying democracy or a police state where more than 700,000 military personnel are kept in the IDA:JK and more than 400,000 in the Sikh Raj, Punjab (under India's occupation since 15th August, 1947. The latter was an “annexed” state to the British Empire. Except for the Mughals and British Empire, no other but the Sikhs ruled the Punjab. Since 15th August, 1947, the Punjab is under Indian occupation, with some Sikh-looking like or turbaned Brahmins-Hindus in ‘The Sikh Identity’ has/have been the head of the state or the Hindus as the Indian president’s agents, i. e. the Governor(s) of the Punjab State. The Sikhs have no Constitutional rights since the Sikh Raj, Punjab, was ‘robbed’ on 15th August, 1947. This is a deliberate discrimination and gross human rights violations of the Sikhs of Punjab by the ‘Brahmins-Hindus’ and the turbaned ‘Brahmins-Hindus in ‘The Sikh Identity’, to exterminate them using an ‘undeclared’ war in 1984.

In fact, India is sitting on the ‘tip of a volcano’, which could erupt at any time. Movements have been going on for sovereignty in the IDA:JK, Punjab, Assam and its 8- sister, Tamils, Christians, forcible conversion and additional violations like torture, fake encounter, rapes, humiliation, dehumanization, political, religious rights, and heavy handedness have been taking place by the law-enforcing forces. This could destroy the so-called incredible democracy of our world, called India. India which unable to feed its own people, that is, more than 76% of its population (more than 1.2 billion) goes to sleep hungry every night, seven days in a week or 365 days in a year since 15th August, 1947. The field rats are consumed as one time’s meal by the farm labourers working in sugarcane fields in South India. India must stop its discrimination against the minorities, i. e., the Sikhs, Muslims, Christians, Dalits, Tamils, Assamese and others.

The third speaker spoke on the discrimination of Dalits by Indian administration to her people on the problems of housing, education, lack of sanitation in unemployment, she finished her presentation within 10-min.

The Chair declared the session open for discussion, questions and answers. There were several hands raised to question Dr Sekhon. They were related mainly on the progress of India in the last 64-year plus time, constitutional rights, Chief, Council of Ministers, Manmohan Sinh’ remarkable guidance to India, without being an unelected Member to Lok Sabha/parliament, appointment of a Sikh as the Chief, Indian army, progress of Dalits as Madam Mayawati is the Chief Minister of the largest state of India, Uttar Pradesh, and personal meetings of a curious person asking to Dr Sekhon that the present prime minister is widely respected in South India. This person, as identified was Ajit Singh, living in U K for the last 25-year and makes at least 3 or 4 visits to India in a year. He categorically said that Manmohan Sinh is virtually worshipped like God in South India. Another person Madam Charanjit Kaur, wife of Ajit Singh, said I am a retired Historian by profession. In her opinion, India is doing fine and it is a great democratic country like the BBC of the U K, and CNN and the President of the United States have been glorifying India daily.

Hearing attentively, Dr Sekhon answered the gentleman’s questions that the gentleman should know that whether it is parliamentary or the presidential democracy, like the United State, he must also know whether in the history of democratic countries, irrespective of the prime minister or president, the appointed as Chief, Council of Minsters, or President in the latter case, has to be elected by the electorates or an elected ‘representative(s)’ of the people, a ‘member of parliament’. Dr Sekhon answered all follow up questions point by point. Relating to Manmohan Sinh, who is never elected to India’s Lok Sabha/parliament, as a ‘Member of Parliament’, from any electoral constituency of India, as far as I would consider it, Mammohan Sinh is misleading the Indian and international community deliberately knowing that he has been sent by the Rajya Sabha/senate of Andhra Pradesh’s college of legislative assembly, and what I would regard is that he is not working in accordance with the Indian Constitution. Rather, he has been raping the democratic institution of the country. Further, on an apology to the Sikhs of Punjab on an 'undeclared' war in June, 1984, the ‘Brahmins- Hindus’ of the Indian parliament did not pass any resolution to offer their ‘apology.’ Merely for the white wash, they had to use the services of a turbaned ‘Brahmin-Hindu’, Chief, Council of Ministers, for offering to the Sikhs of the Sikh Nation, PUNJAB, an 'apology' for the ‘undeclared’ war in the name of a brutal military “Operation Bluestar” of June, 1984. The apology of Manmohan Sinh was “rejected” by the Sikhs of PUNJAB and the Sikh Diaspora outrightly.

Answering another question to Madam Charanjit Kaur, a historian in the U K, asked that the Sikhs’ marriage is solaminized by the ‘Sikh Marriage or Lavan, according to the Sikh Code of Conduct' in a Sikh religious institution. Howerver, the ‘Brahmins-Hindus’ democracy issues a certificate that the “Marriage has been solaminized by the Hindu rites.” What a lie! This is a direct reflection that the “Sikhs have no Constitutional Rights in India.”

From the audience, a comment was made that it seems some government person (s) is sitting and participating in the discussion to distract the problems of the dalits and minorities. Laughter took place.

Chairman Wani clarified the situation with his remark that any citizen could become the prime minister or a member of parliament. However, the person has to be elected to the parliament, by the electorates of an electoral constituency, within six months of his appointment to the office at the rank of cabinet minister or prime minister.
*****
Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon’ Participation in a Seminar at the United Nations:Human Rights Council Date: 26th September, 2011
Time: 13:00 – 15:00
Room: XXII
Palais des Nations, Geneva
Attendee: 58
Moderator: Sardar Amjad Yousaf, Executive Director, Kashmir Institute of International Relations "WOMEN AND CHILDREN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN CONFLICT ZONE"

SPEAKERS: 
1. Princess Micheline Makaou Sjouma, The U N Office, Vienna, AUSTRIA
2. Jurist Altaf Hussain Wani, Kashmir Institute of International Relations
3. Professor Zayas, Human Rights Council and University of Geneva, SWITZERLAND
4. Ms Sadani Malainine, CORCAS NGO, MOROCCO
5. Ms Luna D Orikat, Professor, University of Palestine
6. Ouattara Malvin Aboubakare, President of the NGO, (UVDTAB), Cote d’Ivoire
7. Lawyer Syed Faiz Naqashbandi, Rep. WMC
Human Rights violations in the Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, Internationally Disputed Areas of Jammu and Kashmir since 1947; in Morocco, Africa and world-wide were the subject of this seminar.

Participating in the question period, Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon of CHR&PA said that the South Asian continent, called Indian sub-continent as well, is sitting on the tip of volcano which may erupt at any time. The reason being the gross Human Rights Violation, particularly in  the Internationally Disputed Areas of Jammu and Kashmir, followes by the Punjab of Sikhs, the ‘First Sovereign and Secular’ nation of South Asia (1799 to 14th March, 1849). In fact, India did not exist on the world map and any dictionary and encyclopedia of the English language until 29th March, 1849. The word 'India' was invented in England by the British Empire following the occupation of Punjab of Sikhs on or slight earlier of 29th March, 1849. To elaborate on the subject, I would agree with the Chair that gross violation of human rights have been taking place in order to humiliation and dehumanization of women, children followed by their male folks. In fact, their rights are vigorous violated by the Indian armed personnel, which in my own terminology is “The Brahmins-Hindus’ democracy or alleged Indian democracy.” The high caste Brahmins are notorious for these violations for centuries. Since 15th August, 1947, the Brahmins-Hindus armed forces have been doing their job at the order of the imperial, expansionist and colonist ‘Brahmins-Hindus’ democracy.

Dakha Geet 39


DrqI dI pukfr

myry KflsqfnI puwq srdfrF dy srdfr.
DrqI hF mYN, sohxy mn mohxy Kflsqfn dI,
isMGo ! sux lAu myrI awj pukfr.

1984 ‘c ihMdU Bfxf iBafnk vriqaf,
myrI vYrn bx geI hY ihMd srkfr.

srwbq df Bwlf mMgx vfly isWKF nMU,
ihMdUsqfnIaF ny idWqf awqvfdI krfr.

jdoN isMGF ny hwk afpxf mMigaf,
qF ihMd srkfr ny qopF nfl kIqf vfr.

iswK kOm dy swl klyjy pfAux leI,
jUMn 84 ‘c Zfihaf swcf drbfr.

ihMdU awqvfdIaF ny PV PV mfsUmF nMU mfiraf,
‘qy bygunfh vI mfry keI hjLfr.

hwQ bMn bMn ky ipWCy aOrqF dy,
AunHF ‘qy kIqy gey iGnfAuxy awiqafcfr.

AuhnF awgF lwgf ky sB kuwJ sfiVaf,
‘qy myry puwqr vI sfVy keI hjLfr.

myrI ihwk ‘qy ihMdU vYrI cVH ky bih igaf,
‘qy myrI axK qFeIN irhf vMgfr.

dsF iks qrHF mYN drd afpxf,
myry Gr bYTy, ihMd srkfrI pihrydfr.

bdlf lY lAu qusIN myry apmfn df,
‘qy qusIN sux lAu myrI awj pukfr.

jy rwqf vI quhfzy ivWc axK bfkI,
qF iPr ihMdUsqfnI vYrI qFeIN idAu llkfr.

jwVHF ihMdU rfj dIaF pMjfb ‘coN puwt ky,
bIj KflsqfnI rfj df qusIN idAu iKlfr.

myrf Kflsqfn afjLfd qusIN krf idAu,
‘qy sdf suwKI vsdy rihx myry isWK pirvfr.

“syKoN dfiKaF vfilaf” qYnMU mYN kih idaF,
myry KflsqfnI puwq srdfrF dy srdfr.

Kflsqfn ijMLdfbfd
prmjIq isMG syKoN (dfKf)
510-774-5909
Parmjit Singh Sekhon (Dakha)
President, Dal Khalsa Alliance